Community Cures.com

christine

Do mammagrams CAUSE cancer? Do biopsies spread it????

Today’s testing methods
can actually CAUSE the very cancer
you’re trying to PREVENT!


Dear Health-Conscious friend:

You THINK you’re doing the right things to keep cancer at bay…

You eat right. You exercise. And you willingly go along with an annual mammogram or PSA test, “Just to be safe.”

Well, I’m here to tell you those breast and prostate cancer screening tests may not be keeping you safe.

In fact, there are over a dozen ways you can actually protect your health without making it worse. Ways that could really help reduce your risk for cancer and strengthen your ability to fight it…without harsh chemicals or surgeries.

Mainstream medicine isn’t necessarily trying to kill you, but the methods of diagnosis and treatment they keeping pushing at you CAN be downright deadly.

A leading authority on radiation estimates that as much as 75% of breast cancer could be prevented by avoiding exposure to the ionizing radiation from mammography and x-rays.

Or imagine if you’re the one out of ten men whose PSA level is elevated. In this case, you have a 75% chance you don’t have cancer! Yet, you’re still being asked to go through a horrendous (and likely unnecessary) prostate biopsy that has a high risk for serious infections and a long list of possible side effects…

Protect Yourself With these
Cancer Screening Facts
(Share Them With YOUR Doctor)
Don’t be a victim of fear tactics and false diagnoses. I’ll help you learn the truth about cancer screening so you’ll feel more in control and more confident about your healthcare decisions.

MYTH: “Early Detection Can Help You Avoid Drastic Treatments”

FACT: Neither mammograms nor PSA tests can accurately identify which cancers are lethal, so too many doctors still tend to respond to any sign of cancer with biopsies, drugs, surgery and toxic treatments like chemo and radiation.

MYTH: “Mammograms and PSA Tests Are Safe to Your Body”

FACT: Your annual mammograms expose you to ionizing radiation - the only KNOWN BREAST CANCER CARCINOGEN. And for men? Your PSA blood test is simple enough, but it has a high rate of false positives, leading to painful prostate biopsies with a high risk of infection and even unnecessary life-threatening surgery.

MYTH: “Mammograms or PSA Tests will Protect You from Cancer”

FACT: The call for mass screenings was based on the theory that early detection saves lives. But studies can’t prove that these tests are causing a decline in cancer death rates.


AND – even worse – say your PSA test DOES find cancer cells in your prostate…prostate cancer can be slow growing and won’t necessarily kill you. And, although biopsies are thought to be safe…they could actually help spread more cancer! Even mainstream medicine is beginning to realize that needle pricks from biopsies can actually release cancer cells into your bloodstream.

Beware: cancer in the blood can be extremely violent and difficult to treat. (Oh, and ladies, you’re not safe either – mammograms can spread cancer too!)

Suddenly, these “just-to-be-safe” tumor-detecting tests don’t seem safe at all, do they?

Truth is, the cancer business is having a field day feeding on your fears. Cancer is a scary prospect – and that’s exactly why I don’t believe in keeping up the scare tactics fed to us by the cancer-screening con men.

Share

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

Here is what they did to me: Went for a sonogram ($2,000 ) because I felt a small lump. The sonogram was read and the doctor was 80% sure it was cancer. THE next step: biopsy (why? 80% sure isnt enough). Well because it was another $2000 for the biopsy. Immediatly following the biopsy - I was given a mammogram. ( another $1,000 ) So I had holes in the tumor from the biopsy and now they smashed the tumor and drove radiation into it. I could throw up thinking about it. I didnt know about any of this as all this was happening to me.

Think twice ladies.

I am proactive in my health now, hoping that the idiots didnt spread my cancer with all their stupid actions. I want to warn you. Please share this info with every woman you know. PLEASE. they dont need to live with the fear that I live with daily.....

Reply to This

thermography - new state of the art test. google it.

Reply to This

Well, that is wonderful. gives me more hope! But lots of women arent as lucky as us. I know it does save some lives but some of the things just dont seem necessary. Seems like money is the motivator - You are right, lots of conflicting info...... just have to go with our gut I guess. ( smile )

Reply to This

Wendy,

Yes, prayer, and then other safe treatments. Smart!

I didnt have all of you guys at the time i was going through this. It was a lonely road. I knew I didnt want to get the surgery, but the outside was pressuring me.

The part that worries me about traditional therapy, chemo, radiation is that 15-20 years later it can show up again because all the testing as spread the cells.

Yes alternatives until there is no hope then the other stuff. Most people do it the other way around and then their system is so taxed by the chemo etc that the alternative treatments dont have as good of a chance to work.

No worries, I am not arguing - just wanted to put it out there. Hugs Wendy
No not new, just more used and more available I should have said - being used to actually detect disease by alternative doctors and clinics. ONce something is questionable they refer you to another doctor if you so wish to go the mainstream way. But for screening why not, at least it is something. Sometimes I wonder what would happen if we just left it alone, once we know it is there, just leave it alone and change our diet and use some of the wonderful new supplementation like probiotics ( inliven of course ) ambrotose, stemenhance, some of the juices ( that dont have preservatives ) wouldnt our bodies fight it off? I think mine was fighting it. We just have to give it what it needs !! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! Not needles, and radiation, blah :BLAH freaking BLAH!!!!!!!!!!!!

Reply to This

There is a urine test that detects the presence of cancer cells even before signs or symptoms develop, Dr. Manuel D. Navarro found HCG to be elevated in all types of cancers.
There is a full article on it with instuctions in a book titled Cancer-Free Your guide to Gentle, Non-toxic Healing 2nd editon by Bill Henderson. It is available on Amazon. The article is too long to print here or I would so everyone could have it. But I will if there are enough interested. it is really quite interesting.

Reply to This

Really Michelle? I have bought R.W. Knudsen organic juices with the ingredients
as follows: Fltered water, sufficient to reconstitude organic grape juice concentrate. Certified Organic by Quality Assurance International. Where's the presevatives??
But does that mean there are preservatives? or does it mean they were made cheaper, and really that is not a cheap brand at all. How do you take your Inliven? especially if you are in a hurry? Just curious.
Your welcome Nancy. I dont know for sure of any juice that is presevative free but there is a powder that I know of, it is called radical berry. If interested I will get you more info.

Be too on the stemenhance, , , , ,along with ambrotose, and INliven - I think I will be healthy for another 60 years.

Reply to This

Christine, I agree, I really do think the xrays and mamograms can make things worse. You are not supposed to sqeeze and press that hard on a woman's breasts. This is why people in countries who do not wear bras do not get breast cancer.

I hope i'll be ok. When i had that colonic scare, they had to do xrays on me. why they did it on my chest area, I think that was unnessary.

Reply to This

Yep,
I agree too. If I ever find a lump, Im going to take the money that would normally go for all that testing, buy a plane ticket to another country, and have alternative methods done !!

Reply to This

Hi Nadalie,
Thanks, I've been taking it in grape juice diluted with pure water, hummm good!
I am not concerned so much about the reconstituted part, it the preveritives Michelle mentioned. Shouldn't it say prevereitives. if they are in there.?
Thanks neddie

RSS

The Kevin Trudeau Show
Buy Books Online

Online Now

Natural Cures Chat

Visit the Natural Cures Chat Room.

Chatroom

© 2009   Created by naturalcures

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Privacy  |  Terms of Service